Skip to content

Welcome to Cascadia!

The Cascadia (aka Doug) Flag available from your smALL FLAGs store.

Seattle Chapters:

Speaking of citizenship issues – within America or without – our current “President”‘s citizenship status is unresolved and contentious as ever. Just today a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs about it and he gave the White House’s standard schpiel insisting that Obama is a U.S. citizen. (D.C. blogger Wonkette posted the video clip.)

There are lawsuits still pending in the courts; the most well-articulated is Philadelphia attorney and former Pennsylvania state attorney general Philip J. Berg’s, filed in United States Court for Pennsylvania’s Eastern District.

Here is Berg’s petition to the Judge for a Temporary Restraining Order to bar Obama from running for president.

The conservative blog Right Runner strips down the issue to three simple questions that would be asked of the President if he were to take the stand – which he should – and defend his position:

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?

A: Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel under?

A: There are only three possibilities.

1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,

2) He traveled with a British passport, or

3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible.Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.

The blogger concludes:

When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.

“If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proofThat he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967…”

– From Right Runner [].


In 2004 Steve Woodward ( of the Oregonian wrote “Welcome to Cascadia” (Sunday, November 14, 2004).

Here is the full article (Copyright 2004 Oregon Live):

Welcome to Cascadia

Nearly three decades before the 2004 elections, author Ernest Callenbach asked a prescient question: If we Oregonians, Washingtonians and Northern Californians were in charge, what would we do?

His answer: We’d leave the United States to its own self-created woes and build Ecotopia, our independent utopian society.

The idea was a fringe notion in 1975, when Callenbach’s classic novel “Ecotopia” first captured a young generation’s imagination.

But in the wake of recent national elections, a sovereign Ecotopia — or Cascadia, as it is now widely referred to — is re-emerging as a subject of interest for some. Long bandied about as little more than an engaging thought experiment, the secession of Oregon, Washington, northern California and possibly British Columbia from the United States and Canada suddenly is intriguing everyone from whimsical Web masters to earnest political activists.

That’s right: Cascadia, our Cascadia, a new peaceful, sustainable, neighborly, environmentally friendly strip of fir green and fog gray that stretches anywhere from southern Alaska to northern California.

That is, except for the proposed state of Jefferson, an island of conservative red in a liberal blue sea at the Oregon-California border. But more about that later.

“Ecotopia,” set 20 years after the secession of Oregon, Washington and Northern California, describes a land of electric mass transit, outdoor recreation, video-conferencing and a 20-hour workweek. Freed from the political controls and traditions of the United States, Ecotopia develops an ecosystem that is a perfect balance between humans and the environment.

“It focuses the mind to think about separatist sentiment,” Callenbach says now, “regardless of whether it ever gets serious.”

As he prepares a 30th anniversary edition of “Ecotopia,” Callenbach says the book has become popular again among young people, who don’t see its original environmental messages as impractical fringe theories.

Callenbach also sees a long-term trend toward smaller, localized governments.

“The U.S. is too damn big,” he says. “Small countries are best. They don’t have armies careening around on the other side of world.”

Callenbach points to collaborative governments, such as Oregon’s watershed councils, which bring ranchers, environmentalists, recreationists and Native Americans together to attempt consensus on contentious issues.

“That kind of thing will grow a lot, no matter who is in office,” he says. Cascadians organize

In Portland, people interested in Cascadian independence have already begun organizing.

“There’s a huge buzz in the activist community about Cascadia rising,” says Bryan W., an 18-year-old Portland State University freshman who asked that his last name not be used for fear of reprisals from the federal government.

“There’s a large section of Cascadia that I’ve been in contact with,” he says, “but with Bush being elected, it has gotten even moderates involved.”

The Cascadia Confederacy message group on Yahoo has seen a minor explosion in e-mail traffic, from eight in January to 69 in October and 42 so far in November, according to Yahoo statistics. The confederacy is seeking full sovereignty and self-determination for its citizens, according to its self-description. Cascadia, it says, would move away from capitalism and a nation-state form of government to “a social organizational form that allows for autonomous direct democracies and the flourishing of indigenous culture.”

The Cascadian National Party, a tiny, near-dormant political party launched the day before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, also has seen a recent surge of interest, says Brandon Rhodes, a 20-year-old college student who is the party’s Eugene representative.

It’s not exactly a groundswell: Rhodes’ in-box has gotten about half a dozen e-mails on the subject in the past week. Nevertheless, that’s up from the usual pace of one a month.

The party’s ultimate goal is for Oregon and Washington to secede peacefully from the United States and form the sovereign nation of Cascadia. The party’s priorities would be decentralized government, greater civil liberties, less control by corporate interests and more environmental safeguards.

“Right now, it’s still a matter of kind of saturating the market with the idea instead of running to Canada,” says Rhodes, a third-year student in political science and environmental studies at the University of Oregon. “The Democratic party disappointed a lot of people. A lot of people didn’t like (Kerry) at all. I didn’t vote for him.” Auto sticker sales increase

One of the most whimsical efforts is being waged by Lyle Zapato, who suggests that the sovereign nation of Cascadia already exists in spirit, if not yet in the world atlas.

His Web site, Republic of Cascadia (, defines the country as Oregon, Washington and British Columbia.

“The Republic of Cascadia,” the Web site acknowledges, “is not yet officially recognized by Canada, the United States of America or the United Nations. Not that it is any of their business.”

Zapato, who reveals his geographic location as central Cascadia “near the surface,” created the site in 1998, he writes in an e-mail. The purpose is “to help bring about the revolution to liberate the people of Cascadia from remote Federalist control” — a sentiment also expressed by other, more serious separatists.

Zapato says orders for his Republic of Cascadia auto sticker hit 63 between Nov. 2 and Nov. 5, up from a handful prior to that. Orders are coming from all over Washington and Oregon, with one person ordering 12.

Not exactly huge sales, Zapato writes, “but considering I didn’t do any special advertising of them other than the link on the Cascadia page (that’s been there for well over a year) or try to tie them into current events, it’s kind of amusingly unexpected.” Linking Cascadia by rail

A much more serious effort to link Cascadia together is under way at the Cascadia Center of Seattle’s Discovery Institute. The center doesn’t advocate secession, but rather cooperation among Oregon, Washington and British Columbia.

“The reality is that opportunities lie not in political union, but in strategic alliances,” says Bruce Agnew, the center’s director.

The center’s overarching goal is to promote the notion of a land without borders. Specifically, the think tank is targeting the development of a better transportation system, such as high-speed rail, for people and goods throughout Cascadia.

The 12-year-old center also keeps its eye on the Northwest’s tourism, economics, technology and alternative energy.

Not to mention health care.

“Hordes of people are going to Canada for flu shots and prescription drugs,” Agnew says. “The Bush administration will have to deal with the drug issue.” Reviving Jefferson state

Toward the opposite end of Cascadia, in Northern California, some folks embrace the idea of secession, but not with the rest of Cascadia.

Brian Petersen, a 38-year-old landscaper, tractor mechanic, promoter and part-owner of a car wash in Yreka, Calif., would rather see Northern California merge with Southern Oregon to form the new state of Jefferson.

Petersen lays out his vision on his Web site,, which has existed since 1998.

Fed up with what they see as liberal control from far-flung state capitals, the citizens of Jefferson would constitute a conservative new red state. The driving issues are property rights and local government control.

“Jefferson went for Bush,” Petersen says.

The Jefferson secession effort is hardly new. On Nov. 27, 1941, four Northern California counties, plus Oregon’s Curry County, declared themselves the 49th state of the union. (Alaska and Hawaii had not yet been admitted to the union.)

“Patriotic Jeffersonians intend to secede each Thursday until further notice,” read the declaration, which was handed out to motorists stopped at highway blockades outside of Yreka, the state’s interim capital. Ten days later, the United States was plunged into World War II, and the Jefferson movement evaporated.

Today, Petersen suggests that Jefferson could incorporate the 12 northernmost California counties, along with Coos, Curry, Douglas, Jackson, Josephine, Klamath and Lake counties in Oregon.

“All the pieces are there,” Petersen says. “It’s just a matter of sounding the horn.”

In the San Francisco Bay Area, at the far southern end of Cascadia, “Ecotopia” author Callenbach says he’s now writing a piece about where the United States is in the evolution of empires. Titled “Going Down With the Empire,” the piece notes that, as always, old institutions crumble and new ones rise up.

“There’s a reasonable chance of an ecotopian empire rising up,” he says.

“We have to keep our spirits up,” he adds. “This country has been crazy for a long, long time.”

Steve Woodward: 503-294-5134;

Copyright 2004 Oregon Live. All Rights Reserved

The concept of a Euro-American Homeland in the Pacific has, over the course of American history, held manifold names and labels; territorial boundaries and proposed political philosophies.

Founding Father Thomas Jefferson – Virginian, third President and Consitutional scholar, had in mind the establishment of an independent nation in western North Ameria. He called it the “Republic of the Pacific”.

Republic of Cascadia: most common flag design

By sheer numbers of supporters, perhaps the largest “umbrella” movement is dubbed the Cascadia Independence Movement. Its roots run as far back as does America the nation, and was originally an adjunct to, or off-shoot of, that most American of beliefs – the idea of Manifest Destiny. The Cascadia Independence Movement is influenced as well as by the Southern Secessionist Movement, which reached its apex by the mid-19th century but has stubbornly continued to hold sway over many, many Americans.

And so history has molded the movement: interest in the idea was renewed in recent times with the rise in the 1980s of Richard Butler’s Aryan Nations, which espoused a Northwest Territorial Imperative, seeking to place the racial element front and center by the founding of an “Aryan Homeland” that included the group’s base of Idaho, stretching north, south, and west to the Puget Sound.

The decline and finally bankruptcy (and forced eviction from its compound) of Aryan Nations and the rise of a Euro-American cultural consciousness apart from so-called “Supremacist” ideology has fostered continued and widespread interest in Jefferson’s “Republic of the Pacific”. The bulk of the movement is now an amalgam of environmental – or “green” concerns (“Ecotopia”) and scattered White Nationalist or White Separatist sentiments.  Republic of Cascadia adherents also include Indian Nations, who contribute to the ongoing idea of a “tribal” independence based on culture and ethnicity.

– D.G.W.


No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: